Key Idea.
Section 1
Structuring the Final Argument
A successful scientific conclusion follows the CER framework: Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning. The claim answers the question about the Jalisco Block's motion.
The reasoning is crucial. It connects the data (e.g., "a trench exists") to the scientific principle (e.g., "trenches are formed by subduction"). This logical structure transforms raw data into a persuasive conclusion.
Section 2
The Preponderance of Evidence
In geology, a single data point is rarely enough. The final conclusion about the Jalisco Block is based on the preponderance of evidence.
This means that multiple independent lines of inquiry—GPS data, seismic maps, and volcanic studies—all converge on the same answer. When diverse evidence supports one scientific argument, the conclusion is considered strong and reliable.
Book overview
Jump across lessons in the current chapter without opening the full course modal.
Continue this chapter
Expand to review the lesson summary and core properties.
Section 1
Structuring the Final Argument
A successful scientific conclusion follows the CER framework: Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning. The claim answers the question about the Jalisco Block's motion.
The reasoning is crucial. It connects the data (e.g., "a trench exists") to the scientific principle (e.g., "trenches are formed by subduction"). This logical structure transforms raw data into a persuasive conclusion.
Section 2
The Preponderance of Evidence
In geology, a single data point is rarely enough. The final conclusion about the Jalisco Block is based on the preponderance of evidence.
This means that multiple independent lines of inquiry—GPS data, seismic maps, and volcanic studies—all converge on the same answer. When diverse evidence supports one scientific argument, the conclusion is considered strong and reliable.
Book overview
Jump across lessons in the current chapter without opening the full course modal.
Continue this chapter