Section 1
Historians Use Evidence to Study the Past
Historians ask questions and search for evidence—such as artifacts, documents, and other records—to understand what happened in the past and why it mattered.
This session delves into the methods historians use to understand the past. Students will learn about the different types of evidence historians rely on, including artifacts, documents, and firsthand accounts. The session explains the difference between primary sources (created by people who experienced events) and secondary sources (created after events by others). Students will explore how historians analyze evidence for reliability, recognize point of view, and detect bias. They will understand how historians interpret data, draw conclusions, and present informed interpretations. Examples like the Domesday Book and ancient artifacts help illustrate the historian’s process. Finally, learners will consider why different historians sometimes disagree about historical events and figures.
Section 1
Historians Use Evidence to Study the Past
Historians ask questions and search for evidence—such as artifacts, documents, and other records—to understand what happened in the past and why it mattered.
Section 2
Primary and Secondary Sources Help Tell the Story
Primary sources are original records from the time of the event, like diaries or government records. Secondary sources are created later, like textbooks or biographies, and help provide background and analysis.
Section 3
Point of View and Bias Matter
Every source has a point of view. Historians must identify bias—an unfair or emotional judgment—and decide how reliable the source is before drawing conclusions.
Section 4
Historians Make Inferences and Draw Conclusions
By examining evidence and comparing sources, historians make inferences (educated guesses) and draw conclusions about past events. These conclusions help explain how and why events happened.
Section 5
Historical Interpretations Can Differ
Historians sometimes disagree. Different interpretations, like those about Genghis Khan, are based on how historians view the evidence. A strong historian uses reliable sources to support their conclusions and explains multiple viewpoints.
Book overview
Jump across lessons in the current chapter without opening the full course modal.
Continue this chapter
Expand to review the lesson summary and core properties.
Section 1
Historians Use Evidence to Study the Past
Historians ask questions and search for evidence—such as artifacts, documents, and other records—to understand what happened in the past and why it mattered.
Section 2
Primary and Secondary Sources Help Tell the Story
Primary sources are original records from the time of the event, like diaries or government records. Secondary sources are created later, like textbooks or biographies, and help provide background and analysis.
Section 3
Point of View and Bias Matter
Every source has a point of view. Historians must identify bias—an unfair or emotional judgment—and decide how reliable the source is before drawing conclusions.
Section 4
Historians Make Inferences and Draw Conclusions
By examining evidence and comparing sources, historians make inferences (educated guesses) and draw conclusions about past events. These conclusions help explain how and why events happened.
Section 5
Historical Interpretations Can Differ
Historians sometimes disagree. Different interpretations, like those about Genghis Khan, are based on how historians view the evidence. A strong historian uses reliable sources to support their conclusions and explains multiple viewpoints.
Book overview
Jump across lessons in the current chapter without opening the full course modal.
Continue this chapter